$\newcommand{\vect}[1]{\mathrm{ \vec{\boldsymbol{#1}}}} $ $\newcommand{\vecta}[3]{ \begin{bmatrix} #1\\ #2\\ #3 \end{bmatrix} } $ $\newcommand{\hata}[1]{\mathrm{ \hat{\boldsymbol{#1}}}} $ $ \newcommand{\blbox}[1]{\bbox[8px,border:1px solid black]{#1}}$
Home Page
Next Page

Classical Coupling

Page under heavy development. Not chronologically ordered at the moment (7/25).

This is intended as an introductory, undergraduate-level module for modelling coupled oscillators.

In classical mechanics, systems must transfer energy through some medium in order to achieve coupling.

Why do we care about obtaining a mathematical model for a system of coupled, oscillating masses?

Recall that a particle on a spring is subject to a linear restorative force (Hooke's Law):

$$\blbox{F(x) = -kx} \tag{Eq. 1}$$ In terms of energy mechanics, the particle is subject to the familiar harmonic potential $U(x)$: $$\blbox{U(x') = \int_{0}^{x} -kx'\ dx' = \frac{1}{2}kx^2} \tag{Eq. 2}$$ Our mechanical oscillator has total energy $E = T + U$, where T is the system's kinetic energy: $$\blbox{E = \frac{1}{2}m v^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx^2} \tag{Eq. 3}$$

For a mechanical system undergoing non-rotational motion, x is the center of mass (of the rigid body). Describing motion of a rigid body is a step-up from particles (point-masses in analytial mechanics).


Placeholder